Res-Q-Jack rescue struts stabilize vehicle for safe extrication
Res-Q-Jack Stabilization Procedure - Read more...
Home arrow apps menu arrow Buttress Stabilization - Part 3
Buttress Stabilization - Part 3 Print E-mail

By Cris Pasto, Spencer Fire Dept./Cepco Tool Co.
 
In the first two segments of this series we discussed equipment and techniques used in buttress stabilization of side-resting vehicles.  In this section we will take a look at the potential forces buttress equipment is exposed to in 3-point side-resting passenger vehicle stabilization.  The particular forces we will look at include the compressive column loads in the buttress stands as well as the tension loads experienced in base restraint strapping.  We will also walk through an example to illustrate how one might use this information to gain a better understanding of how one might apply the theoretical data to a real world situation.

Column & Strap Forces: Side-resting Stabilization

How much force does it take to stabilize a vehicle?  That’s a question with many answers.  If we are simply stabilizing a side-resting passenger vehicle in direct contact with flat ground, the answer is typically very little.  However, if we intend to suspend or lift the vehicle we potentially have a much different situation.  We should be using additional tools meant for the lifting application which may be special jacks or lift bags, and reserve the stabilization equipment for stabilization.  If we use the same equipment for both applications, we have no backup.  While lifting we should employ the “lift an inch, crib an inch” policy which is a simple task if we have a side wind type adjustment jack in our stabilization stand.  If the lift bag fails, the stabilization equipment should at least have the capacity to support the weight of the vehicle.  A chart (Table 1) is presented here with approximate passenger vehicle weight data for several classes of vehicles.

Table 1: Weights of Typical Passenger Vehicles

 

Vehicle Type

 

Approx. Weight (lbs.)

 

Passenger Car - Compact

 

         2500

Passenger Car - Mid-size

         3200

Passenger Car - Large

         3800

Minivan

         3900

SUV - Standard Size

         3900

SUV - Large Size

         5300

Pickup - Small

         3500

Pickup - Standard

         4400

Pickup - Large

         6100

Using vehicle weight data in conjunction with a series of analytical relationships we can approximate compressive column loads in the stands and tensile forces in restraint strapping.  Variables which will impact these forces in addition to the vehicle weight include the angle the stand is set at, the number of stands, the position of the stands relative to the vehicle center of gravity, the number of base restraint straps, and the angle between the base restraint straps if more than one strap is applied.  To simplify this otherwise indeterminate problem, several approximations are made:

a. 100% of the vehicle weight is supported by the 3-point system

b. The stands are placed symmetrically about the vehicle center of gravity

c. The stands are all placed at the same angle (50, 60, or 70 degrees)

d. The ground is flat and frictionless (simulates a flat icy surface)

e. Straps are symmetric about the base


A diagram of a side-resting car (Fig. 1) shows the designation for the column loads and stand angles.  A second diagram (Fig. 2) illustrates how the stand loads act to create tension in the base restraint strapping.

 Fig. 1: Column Load Diagram

Column Load Diagram 1

F1, F2, & F3 = Compression force in stands

a = Stand angle

W = Vehicle weight

 

Fig. 2: Base Strapping Load Diagram
 
Base Strapping Load Diagram
 
T1, T2, & T3 = Tension force in straps

a = Stand angle

b = Strap angle

Fc = Column load


Table 2: Column Loads Vs. Stand Angle & Vehicle Weight
 
 

Stand Angle

 

Vehicle Weight

 

Col. Load*

 

 

 

 

a  (degrees)

W (lbs.)

F1

F2

F3

 

50

 

2500

 

 1632

 

 816

 

 816

50

3500

 2284

 1142

 1142

50

4500

 2937

 1469

 1469

50

5500

 3590

 1795

 1795

50

6500

 4243

 2121

 2121

 

60

 

2500

 

 1443

 

 722

 

 722

60

3500

 2021

 1010

 1010

60

4500

 2598

 1299

 1299

60

5500

 3175

 1588

 1588

60

6500

 3753

 1876

 1876

 

70

 

2500

 

 1330

 

 665

 

 665

70

3500

 1862

 931

 931

70

4500

 2394

 1197

 1197

70

5500

 2926

 1463

 1463

70

6500

 3459

 1729

 1729

 
* Column loads are based on the following assumptions:

F1 = (W/2) x (1/sin(a))

F2 = F3 = (F1/2)

Stands are symmetric about vehicle center of gravity

Vehicle is completely supported by stands - no vehicle to ground contact

All Stands applied at same angle
 
Table 3: Strap Load Using Only 1 Strap (strap 1) 
 

 

 

 

 

 

Stand Angle

 

Column Load

 

Strap Load*

 

 

a

Fc

T1

 

 

50

 

1632

 

1049

 

 

50

2284

1468

 

50

2937

1888

 

50

3590

2308

 

50

4243

2727

 

 

60

 

1443

 

722

 

 

60

2021

1010

 

60

2598

1299

 

60

3175

1588

 

60

3753

1876

 

 

70

 

1330

 

455

 

 

70

1862

637

 

70

2394

819

 

70

2926

1001

 

70

3459

1183

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

* Strap loads are based on the following assumptions:

Only single strap at base

T1 = Fc  x cos(a)

Frictionless ground surface under base

 

Table 4: Strap Load Using 2 Straps (straps 2 & 3) vs. Stand Angle, Column Load, & Strap Angle


Stand Angle

 

Column Load

 

Strap Angle

 

Strap Load*

 

Strap Angle

 

Strap Load*

 

Strap Angle

 

Strap Load*

a

Fc

b

T2, T3

b

T2, T3

b

T2, T3

 

50

 

1632

 

0

 

524

 

22.5

 

568

 

45

 

742

50

2284

0

734

22.5

795

45

1038

50

2937

0